NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING, INTENT, AND AFFIRMATION OF STANDING

For consideration:

Latest version (Sunday 4 October 2026):

NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING, INTENT, AND AFFIRMATION OF STANDING

TO: The administrative officers, agents, and representatives of the entity operating as the [Insert Department, Agency, or Court Name], and all associated corporate departments, instrumentalities, and political administrative bodies.
FROM: [Your Full Christian Name], a living man/woman upon the land.

1. JURISDICTION AND COVENANT UNDER ALMIGHTY GOD

Be it known and recorded that the author, [Your Full Christian Name], stands first and foremost under the sovereign jurisdiction and moral law of Almighty God, Jesus Christ, King of Kings and Lord of Lords, and recognizes no temporal power, statute, regulation, or commercial code that attempts to supersede or undermine that supreme authority.
The author acknowledges and claims the original and lawful compact declared in the Preamble of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 (63 & 64 Vict. c. 12), wherein the people of the several States resolved to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth, explicitly:
“humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God…”
This spiritual and legal covenant constitutes the foundational cornerstone of lawful governance upon this soil. The removal, abandonment, or administrative ignoring of this reliance by subsequent statutory enactments is void ab initio for want of lawful authority.

2. FIDELITY TO THE DE JURE CROWN AND REJECTION OF CORPORATE FICTIONS

The author maintains lawful allegiance exclusively to the de jure Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia as consecrated under the original constitutional framework of 1901, wherein the Sovereign reigns under God as the sworn Defender of the Faith, bound by sacred coronation oath to administer the laws of the realm and govern the people according to their laws and customs.
Take formal notice that the author:
  1. Rejects the Severed Style: Explicitly rejects any administrative re-creation, severance, or alteration of the Crown—including the artificial, statutory style created under the Royal Style and Titles Act 1973 or associated legislation—which strips the Sovereign of the constitutional obligation as Defender of the Faith and reduces the Crown to an instrument of private political parties or commercial corporate registry.
  2. Rejects Corporate Status: Is not a commercial vessel, cargo, legal entity, artificial person, or corporate franchise registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other administrative or financial ledger. Any legal fiction, ens legis, or all-caps corporate designation (e.g., [YOUR SURNAME IN FULL CAPS] or similar variations) belongs entirely to the state-created administrative system and is not to be confused with the living flesh-and-blood man/woman.
  3. Rejects Maritime Jurisdiction on Land: Does not dwell upon or within the legal fiction of submerged lands, maritime zones, or coastal waters under the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973 or Admiralty jurisdiction, but lives, breathes, and exercises inherent dominion upon the lawful dry land of the Commonwealth under the unalienable protections of English Common Law as received and settled at Federation in 1901.

3. FOUNDATIONAL GUARANTEES

The author claims the full benefit and protection of the ancestral Imperial Acts, which constitute the essential framework of the Common Law and the liberty of the subject, including but not limited to:
  • Magna Carta (1215): Specifically the guarantee that no free man shall be seized, imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
  • The Habeas Corpus Act (1679): The essential protection against arbitrary detention, ensuring that any person held in custody has the right to be brought before a court to determine the lawfulness of that detention.
  • The Bill of Rights (1688): Specifically the prohibition against the suspending of laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament, the protection of the right to petition, and the prohibition of excessive bail or cruel and unusual punishments.
  • The Act of Settlement (1701): Which secured the Protestant succession and the rule of law as the basis for the Sovereign’s title, reinforcing the Crown’s duty to govern according to the statutes and customs of the realm.
The author maintains that these protections are inherent rights preserved as part of the English Common Law received into the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901. Any administrative act or tribunal that attempts to bypass the requirements of Due Process, or to act without the authority of these foundational statutes, is acting in breach of the sacred trust between the Crown and the people.

4. REVOCATION OF IMPLIED CONSENT AND REPUDIATION OF CORPORATE ADHESION

Take formal notice that the author, having recognized the systemic deceit and material misrepresentation inherent in the modern administrative machinery, formally executes this Revocation of Consent:
  • Repudiation of Implied Adhesion: The author repudiates any and all implied contracts, corporate citizen designations, and commercial adhesion obligations deceptively attached to the author’s person, property, or estate. The author affirms that any prior interaction with the administrative apparatus occurred under the mistaken presumption of dealing with lawful constitutional government, procured through the fraudulent concealment of the state’s conversion into an administrative corporation.
  • Non-Consent to Corporate Jurisdiction: Any attempt to bind the author to statutory enactments, commercial codes, regulations, or administrative directives operating outside the constitutional authority of the 1901 Commonwealth is rejected as unlawful coercion and private trespass. The author gives notice of total refusal to act as an accommodation party, surety, trustee, or franchise agent for any political party apparatus or commercial municipal entity.
  • Immediate Rescission: The author rescinds any presumption of contractual submission to corporate authority. As a living man/woman upon the land, the author refuses all commercial legal fictions, standing solely upon God-given rights and the protections of the de jure Commonwealth under the Crown established in 1901.

5. JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE AND RECORD OF NON-CONSENT

Take notice that any officer, administrative magistrate, or agent acting without explicit de jure Crown authority sits merely coram non judice—in the presence of the assembly without constitutional jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the natural rights, property, or conscience of the author.
  • No Assumed Contract: The author has never knowingly, voluntarily, or intentionally surrendered original constitutional protections, nor entered into unconscionable adhesion contracts that trade God-given liberties for corporate administrative privileges.
  • Preservation of Vested Rights: Pursuant to the principles of law established at Federation, and specifically as reflected in Sections 7 and 8 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, the repeal or amendment of any Act does not extinguish, affect, or take away any right, privilege, obligation, or liability acquired or accrued under the original Commonwealth. The author maintains that the rights of the people, as vested at the time of Federation, are immutable and cannot be hidden, obscured, or removed by the subsequent repeal of legislation or the adoption of corporate-statutory frameworks.
  • Reservation of Rights: All unalienable, natural, and inherited rights are expressly reserved at all times under traditional English Common Law as it existed and was received at the time of Federation on 1 January 1901. The author explicitly disclaims and rejects any jurisdiction based upon modern, judge-made “Australian common law” or administrative jurisprudence developed subsequent to the severance of the Crown. The author demands strict adherence to the Due Process protections established in the aforementioned Imperial Acts, and rejects any administrative procedure that substitutes summary judgment for the lawful process of the land. Any party claiming a lawful cause of action must present an injured party, verified under oath, bearing lawful standing under the original 1901 constitutional compact and the received English Common Law.

6. SOLEMN AFFIRMATION

This instrument stands as an unrebutted lawful declaration of standing on the public record. Any attempt to enforce statutory fines, codes, corporate administrative mandates, or unconstitutional judgments against the living soul or private property of the author shall be treated as an act of administrative overreach, private trespass, and actionable breach of trust.
Executed and sealed on the land, under the authority of the Almighty and the true Commonwealth of Australia:
Date: ____________________
Autograph: __________________________________________

[Your Christian/Given Name(s)], living man/woman

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Witness 1 Autograph: ___________________________

Address: _____________________________

Witness 2 Autograph: ___________________________

Address: _____________________________

 

Earlier version (Friday 2 October 2026):

TO: The administrative officers, agents, and representatives of the entity operating as the [Insert Department, Agency, or Court Name], and all associated corporate departments, instrumentalities, and political administrative bodies.

FROM: [Your Full Christian Name], a living man/woman upon the land.

1. JURISDICTION AND COVENANT UNDER ALMIGHTY GOD

Be it known and recorded that the author, [Your Full Christian Name], stands first and foremost under the sovereign jurisdiction and moral law of Almighty God, Jesus Christ, King of Kings and Lord of Lords, and recognizes no temporal power, statute, regulation, or commercial code that attempts to supersede or undermine that supreme authority.
The author acknowledges and claims the original and lawful compact declared in the Preamble of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 (63 & 64 Vict. c. 12), wherein the people of the several States resolved to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth, explicitly:
“humbly relying on the blessing of Almighty God…”
This spiritual and legal covenant constitutes the foundational cornerstone of lawful governance upon this soil. The removal, abandonment, or administrative ignoring of this reliance by subsequent statutory enactments is void ab initio for want of lawful authority.

2. FIDELITY TO THE DE JURE CROWN AND REJECTION OF CORPORATE FICTIONS

The author maintains lawful allegiance exclusively to the de jure Crown of the Commonwealth of Australia as consecrated under the original constitutional framework of 1901, wherein the Sovereign reigns under God as the sworn Defender of the Faith, bound by sacred coronation oath to administer the laws of the realm and govern the people according to their laws and customs.
Take formal notice that the author:
  1. Rejects the Severed Style: Explicitly rejects any administrative re-creation, severance, or alteration of the Crown—including the artificial, statutory style created under the Royal Style and Titles Act 1973 or associated legislation—which strips the Sovereign of the constitutional obligation as Defender of the Faith and reduces the Crown to an instrument of private political parties or commercial corporate registry.
  2. Rejects Corporate Status: Is not a commercial vessel, cargo, legal entity, artificial person, or corporate franchise registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or any other administrative or financial ledger. Any legal fiction, ens legis, compound title (Name+Surname), or all-caps corporate designation (e.g., [YOUR SURNAME IN FULL CAPS] or similar variations) belongs entirely to the state-created administrative system and is not to be confused with the living flesh-and-blood man/woman.
  3. Rejects Maritime Jurisdiction on Land: Does not dwell upon or within the legal fiction of submerged lands, maritime zones, or coastal waters under the Seas and Submerged Lands Act 1973 or Admiralty jurisdiction, but lives, breathes, and exercises inherent dominion upon the lawful dry land of the Commonwealth under the unalienable protections of English Common Law as received and settled at Federation in 1901.

3. FOUNDATIONAL GUARANTEES

The author claims the full benefit and protection of the ancestral Imperial Acts, which constitute the essential framework of the Common Law and the liberty of the subject, including but not limited to:
  • Magna Carta (1215): Specifically the guarantee that no free man shall be seized, imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, except by the lawful judgment of his peers or by the law of the land.
  • The Habeas Corpus Act (1679): The essential protection against arbitrary detention, ensuring that any person held in custody has the right to be brought before a court to determine the lawfulness of that detention.
  • The Bill of Rights (1688): Specifically the prohibition against the suspending of laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament, the protection of the right to petition, and the prohibition of excessive bail or cruel and unusual punishments.
  • The Act of Settlement (1701): Which secured the Protestant succession and the rule of law as the basis for the Sovereign’s title, reinforcing the Crown’s duty to govern according to the statutes and customs of the realm.
The author maintains that these protections are inherent rights preserved as part of the English Common Law received into the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901. Any administrative act or tribunal that attempts to bypass the requirements of Due Process, or to act without the authority of these foundational statutes, is acting in breach of the sacred trust between the Crown and the people.

4. JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE AND RECORD OF NON-CONSENT

Take notice that any officer, administrative magistrate, or agent acting without explicit de jure Crown authority sits merely coram non judice—in the presence of the assembly without constitutional jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the natural rights, property, or conscience of the author.
  • No Assumed Contract: The author has never knowingly, voluntarily, or intentionally surrendered original constitutional protections, nor entered into unconscionable adhesion contracts that trade God-given liberties for corporate administrative privileges.
  • Preservation of Vested Rights: Pursuant to the principles of law established at Federation, and specifically as reflected in Sections 7 and 8 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, the repeal or amendment of any Act does not extinguish, affect, or take away any right, privilege, obligation, or liability acquired or accrued under the original Commonwealth. The author maintains that the rights of the people, as vested at the time of Federation, are immutable and cannot be hidden, obscured, or removed by the subsequent repeal of legislation or the adoption of corporate-statutory frameworks.
  • Reservation of Rights: All unalienable, natural, and inherited rights are expressly reserved at all times under traditional English Common Law as it existed and was received at the time of Federation on 1 January 1901. The author explicitly disclaims and rejects any jurisdiction based upon modern, judge-made “Australian common law” or administrative jurisprudence developed subsequent to the severance of the Crown. The author demands strict adherence to the Due Process protections established in the aforementioned Imperial Acts, and rejects any administrative procedure that substitutes summary judgment for the lawful process of the land. Any party claiming a lawful cause of action must present an injured party, verified under oath, bearing lawful standing under the original 1901 constitutional compact and the received English Common Law.

5. SOLEMN AFFIRMATION

This instrument stands as an unrebutted lawful declaration of standing on the public record. Any attempt to enforce statutory fines, codes, corporate administrative mandates, or unconstitutional judgments against the living soul or private property of the author shall be treated as an act of administrative overreach, private trespass, and actionable breach of trust.
Executed and sealed on the land, under the authority of the Almighty and the true Commonwealth of Australia:
Date: ____________________

Autograph: __________________________________________

[Your Christian/Given Name(s)], living man/woman

All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

Witness 1 Autograph: ___________________________

Address: _____________________________

Witness 2 Autograph: ___________________________

Address: _____________________________

Last Updated 2 weeks ago

Views: 134

More share platforms
1

Posted by Jillian