A Practical Guide for Men and Women Dealing with Government and Business
Introduction
The Australian Consumer Law (ACL) is one of the most significant pieces of consumer protection legislation in Australian legal history. It replaced a patchwork of Commonwealth, State, and Territory legislation with a single national law, operative from 1 January 2011. It prohibits misleading and deceptive conduct, unconscionable conduct, unfair contract terms, and false representations. It also establishes consumer guarantees for goods and services.
Yet the ACL does not apply universally. Its reach depends on who is doing what, in what capacity, and under which constitutional basis it is being applied. Men and women dealing with government bodies, corporations, and traders are frequently unaware that some of the entities they deal with daily are not bound by the ACL in the way a private business would be — and that some government bodies are bound more broadly than they might expect.
This guide sets out, in plain terms, the framework for determining whether the ACL applies to a given entity or transaction.
Part 1: Where Is the ACL Found?
The ACL is Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA). It operates in two distinct ways:
As a law of the Commonwealth, under CCA s 131(1), it applies principally to conduct by corporations.
As a law of each State and Territory, applied by State and Territory Fair Trading legislation, it applies more broadly — to men and women carrying on business, bodies corporate incorporated under State or Territory law, and men and women ordinarily resident in or connected to that jurisdiction.
The State and Territory application Acts are:
- Fair Trading (Australian Consumer Law) Act 1992 (ACT)
- Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW)
- Consumer Affairs and Fair Trading Act (NT)
- Fair Trading Act 1989 (Qld)
- Fair Trading Act 1987 (SA)
- Australian Consumer Law (Tasmania) Act 2010 (Tas)
- Fair Trading Act 1999 (Vic)
- Fair Trading Act 2010 (WA)
The practical effect of this dual operation is significant: an entity that escapes the ACL as a Commonwealth law may still be caught by it as a State law, and vice versa.
Part 2: The Crown — A Special Position
The general rule
The ACL binds the Crown in right of the Commonwealth to the extent that the Crown is carrying on a business, either directly or by an authority of the Commonwealth, as if the Crown were a corporation: CCA, s 2A.
The same rule applies to the Crown in right of each State and Territory, through the respective Fair Trading Acts.
The key phrase is “carrying on a business.” The mere fact that a government body charges fees, collects money, or provides services does not make it a business for ACL purposes. Regulatory and sovereign functions — taxation, licensing, border control, law enforcement, rate collection, the administration of statutory benefit schemes — are not “carrying on a business.” The ACL does not apply to those functions even if the Crown body is otherwise engaged in commercial activities in other parts of its operations.
The critical distinction: non-corporate vs corporate Commonwealth entities
The Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth) (PGPA Act), s 11, draws the foundational line:
“Corporate Commonwealth entities are legally separate from the Commonwealth, whereas non-corporate Commonwealth entities are part of the Commonwealth.”
This distinction has direct ACL consequences.
A non-corporate Commonwealth entity (NCE) — a Department of State, for example — is the Crown itself. Its actions are Crown actions. The ACL applies to it only if it is carrying on a business.
A corporate Commonwealth entity (CCE) is legally separate from the Commonwealth. It has its own distinct legal personality. It is not the Crown. It is treated as a corporation for ACL purposes and is bound when engaging in trade or commerce, without needing to satisfy a separate “carrying on a business” threshold in the same way.
The current classification of every Commonwealth entity is maintained in the PGPA (Scope of Chapter 2) Rules (a legislative instrument) and in the Department of Finance’s published List of Australian Government Bodies and Governance Relationships, both available at legislation.gov.au and finance.gov.au respectively.
Part 3: What Is and Is Not Bound — The Framework Applied
Plainly bound by the ACL
Private corporations — any company incorporated under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and engaged in trade or commerce is squarely bound. This covers the vast majority of businesses a man or woman deals with: retailers, service providers, tradespeople operating through a company, landlords operating through a corporate structure, and so on.
Corporate Commonwealth entities engaged in commercial activity — these are legally separate from the Crown and treated as corporations. Examples include Australia Post (Australian Postal Corporation), which supplies postal and parcel services commercially, and NBN Co Limited, which supplies telecommunications infrastructure. Where such an entity supplies goods or services in a market, the ACL applies to that conduct.
State and Territory government bodies incorporated as bodies corporate and carrying on business — a body corporate incorporated under State law (such as a local government council, incorporated under the relevant Local Government Act) is caught by the ACL as a State law through the body corporate provision, regardless of whether it qualifies as a “trading corporation” under s 51(xx) of the Constitution. The High Court confirmed in R v Trade Practices Tribunal; Ex parte St George County Council (1974) 130 CLR 533 that municipal corporations are not “trading corporations” for constitutional purposes — but this does not prevent the ACL from reaching them through the State law mechanism when they engage in business activities.
Sole traders and individuals carrying on a business — the ACL as a State law applies to men and women carrying on business within the State or Territory. A sole trader who misleads, engages in unconscionable conduct, or breaches consumer guarantees is not protected by the absence of corporate status.
Bound only when “carrying on a business”
Non-corporate Commonwealth entities — Departments of State, including the Australian Taxation Office, the Department of Home Affairs, the Department of Health, Services Australia (which administers Centrelink and Medicare), and similar bodies — are part of the Crown. The ACL applies to them only to the extent they are carrying on a business. Their core regulatory and service-delivery functions — assessing tax, processing visa applications, administering Medicare benefits, paying Centrelink entitlements — are not “carrying on a business” and are not subject to the ACL. If such a department were to supply goods or services commercially in a market alongside private suppliers, that commercial activity could be caught.
State and Territory Crown bodies acting in regulatory or sovereign capacity — State government departments, public authorities exercising statutory regulatory powers, and similar bodies are in the same position. Their regulatory conduct is not “trade or commerce.” Their commercial activities may be.
Not bound by the ACL — the financial services exclusion
The ACL expressly does not apply to the supply, or possible supply, of financial services or financial products: CCA, s 131A.
This is a significant exclusion that frequently surprises men and women who assume their bank, insurer, or superannuation fund is subject to the ACL. They are not — at least not for those products and services. The applicable regime for financial services consumer protection is Division 2, Part 2 of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act), which contains parallel prohibitions on misleading conduct, unconscionable conduct, and unfair contract terms in the financial services context. The regulator for that regime is the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), not the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).
Financial services and financial products include banking products (loans, deposit accounts), insurance policies, superannuation, managed investment schemes, and financial advice. Men and women with complaints in those areas should look to the ASIC Act regime and, for dispute resolution, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).
Part 4: Common Situations and How the Framework Applies
A council issues a compliance notice and demands payment of fees. The council is a body corporate incorporated under the relevant Local Government Act. Its regulatory and compliance functions are not “trade or commerce.” The ACL does not apply to a statutory demand or compliance notice. However, if the council makes false or misleading representations about a man or woman’s legal obligations in connection with those demands, the position requires closer examination — particularly whether the conduct occurs in connection with any commercial activity of the council.
A council charges for waste collection, development application fees, or similar services. These activities may constitute business activities for ACL purposes when the council is acting in a commercial rather than purely regulatory capacity. The ACL definition of “trade or commerce” explicitly includes “any business or professional activity (whether or not carried on for profit).”
Australia Post fails to deliver a parcel and makes representations about its liability. Australia Post is a corporate Commonwealth entity supplying postal and parcel services in a commercial market. It is squarely bound by the ACL. Consumer guarantees apply. Misleading representations about liability limits or rights would engage the ACL.
A bank missells a financial product. The ACL does not apply. The applicable protections are in the ASIC Act. Complaints go to AFCA.
The ATO makes a misrepresentation about a taxpayer’s obligations. The ATO is a non-corporate Commonwealth entity exercising regulatory and revenue functions. Those functions are not “carrying on a business.” The ACL does not apply. Administrative law remedies and review through the Administrative Review Tribunal are the relevant avenues.
Services Australia (Centrelink) incorrectly advises a man or woman about their entitlements. Services Australia administers statutory benefit schemes. That is not “carrying on a business.” The ACL does not apply. The relevant avenue is the Administrative Review Tribunal for merits review, or the Commonwealth Ombudsman for administrative conduct failures.
A private insurer makes misleading representations about a home insurance policy. The insurer supplies financial products. The ACL does not apply by virtue of CCA, s 131A. The ASIC Act applies. Complaints go to AFCA.
Part 5: How to Determine Whether the ACL Applies in a Specific Case
A man or woman seeking to determine whether the ACL applies to a specific body or transaction should work through the following questions in sequence.
First: is the entity a private corporation, sole trader, or individual carrying on a business? If yes, the ACL applies as a Commonwealth law (for corporations) or as a State law (for all of those).
Second: if the entity is a government body, is it a corporate Commonwealth entity or a non-corporate Commonwealth entity? The Department of Finance list at finance.gov.au provides the current classification.
Third: if it is a non-corporate entity (part of the Crown), is it carrying on a business in the relevant activity? If no, the ACL does not apply to that activity.
Fourth: regardless of the Commonwealth law position, is the entity a body corporate incorporated under a State or Territory law? If yes, it is caught by the ACL as a State law when carrying on business within the State or Territory.
Fifth: does the transaction involve a financial service or financial product? If yes, the ACL is excluded by CCA, s 131A. The ASIC Act applies instead.
Part 6: Key Sources
The following primary sources govern the matters addressed in this guide. Men and women should verify current versions against the sources listed, as legislation changes.
Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), including Schedule 2 (the ACL) — at legislation.gov.au.
Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (Cth), s 11, and the PGPA (Scope of Chapter 2) Rules — at legislation.gov.au.
Department of Finance, List of Australian Government Bodies and Governance Relationships — at finance.gov.au.
State and Territory Fair Trading Acts (listed in Part 1 above) — at the respective State and Territory legislation websites.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth), Division 2, Part 2 — at legislation.gov.au.
R v Trade Practices Tribunal; Ex parte St George County Council (1974) 130 CLR 533 — on the constitutional position of municipal corporations.
CEO, Aboriginal Areas Protection Authority v Director of National Parks [2024] HCA 16 — on the legal separateness of statutory corporations from the Crown.
Conclusion
The ACL is a powerful instrument but it is not a universal one. Its reach is defined by the constitutional basis on which it operates, the character of the entity involved, and the nature of the conduct in question. Men and women who assume that all government dealings are automatically covered by the ACL may find themselves without that protection at a critical moment. Equally, those who assume that a government body cannot be caught by the ACL because it is “government” may be overlooking a significant avenue of redress — particularly where a council or corporate government body is engaged in commercial activity.
The first step is always to identify the entity, its legal character, and the nature of the conduct. The sources set out in Part 6 provide the means to do so from primary sources.
Lex prospicit, non respicit — the law looks forward, not backward. This guide reflects the law as at May 2026. Legislation and entity classifications are subject to change. This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice.
Last Updated 4 months ago
Views: 180